Honest comparison

We name our competitors. Some of them you should install.

A vendor comparison page that only lists wins is an ad. This one tells you where each tool genuinely beats us, and when you don't need Graneth at all.

Every claim below was verified 2026-07-14 against primary sources — the vendors' own shipped packages, docs and registry APIs, not their marketing pages. These numbers move; check them yourself.

Detecting a hallucinated package is not a moat — good free tools do it, and more appear every month. What none of them issues is PROOF: a signed, independently verifiable record that a specific delivery was checked. That is what Graneth sells; the detection is the free part.

These tools guard different gates, so most of them combine with Graneth rather than replace it. Where one genuinely covers your case alone, we say so.

Aikido Safe Chain

github.com

Free, open-source wrappers around your install commands (npm, yarn, pnpm, pip, uv, poetry): malware and known-bad names are blocked the moment you install. Install it — seriously.

Where it beats us
  • Guards the install itself, backed by Aikido's malware intelligence — the gate closest to where malicious code executes
  • Massive adoption (~170k downloads/week) and zero-friction setup for a human terminal
  • Blocks brand-new packages (< 48h) without breaking builds
Where we differ
  • It wraps the install command — a dependency your agent writes into a manifest and commits WITHOUT installing never crosses its gate; registries covered today are npm + PyPI
  • No secrets scanning, no verdict for the agent loop, no client-facing proof

Socket MCP (depscore)

github.com

Socket's free MCP tool scores packages your agent asks about: supply-chain risk, quality, maintenance, vulnerabilities — from one of the deepest metadata sets in the industry, across 8+ ecosystems.

Where it beats us
  • Far richer per-package metadata than our risk shape — years of supply-chain research behind the scores
  • Broader ecosystem coverage (Maven, NuGet and more)
Where we differ
  • The agent must NAME the packages — depscore never sees your staged diff, so a hallucinated import it wasn't asked about sails through; no secrets, no CLEAR/BLOCKED verdict, no signed receipts

Codacy

codacy.com

A broad code-quality and security platform: coverage, duplication, complexity, SAST, IaC — with IDE guardrails and an AI-governance layer. If you need code QUALITY breadth, take it.

Where it beats us
  • Code-quality metrics we deliberately don't do (coverage, duplication, complexity)
  • GitLab and Bitbucket support; mature org management
Where we differ
  • Its MCP requires an account token for every call, and its dependency security is CVE-based — a scanner class that is structurally blind to a package that never existed; no registry existence checks, no signed receipts

SonarQube / Sonar

sonarsource.com

The enterprise code-quality standard, especially in DACH. Not a supply-chain tool — we simply don't compete.

Where it beats us
  • Everything about static code quality at enterprise scale, self-hosted included
Where we differ
  • No slopsquat/hallucination coverage and no per-delivery proof — run both; they answer different questions
When you don't need Graneth
  • Nobody ever asks you to PROVE your diligence — no enterprise clients, no NIS2/CRA flow-down, no security questionnaires. A scanner alone is enough: take Safe Chain and keep the free pre_flight_check if it helps.
  • You don't ship AI-generated code. Our whole detection layer targets what agents get wrong; classic linters and CVE scanners already cover the rest.
  • You need compliance-grade CVE/SCA reports and SBOMs — that's Snyk/Trivy territory. We detect what never existed; they audit what does.
  • You need code-quality metrics — coverage, duplication, complexity. Codacy and Sonar do this well; we deliberately never will.
What, as of today, only Graneth does
  • Signed per-delivery receipts (Ed25519) your client verifies against our published key — without trusting us, without an account. None of the tools above issues cryptographic proof of review.
  • The generation-time gate in one account-less call: imports AND manifest changes in your staged diff, checked against six registries, plus hardcoded-secret scanning — before anything is committed or installed.
  • A shared threat feed bundled into the free MCP: a known hallucinated name stays blocked even AFTER an attacker registers the package — the exact moment every pure existence check goes silent.
  • A German and Czech product surface. Every vendor above speaks to DACH buyers in English only (verified via their pages' hreflang).

If any claim here is wrong or has gone stale, tell us: [email protected]. We would rather correct this page than have you catch it first.